<<back

Chapter 7

 Assessment Guidline For Human Values-Based Water,Sanitation and Hygiene Education

Definitions (Note to publisher:  The definition is not to be in the main text but be placed at the side column).

Evaluation:

      Evaluation is the determination of a thing’s value.  In education, it is the formal determination of the quality, effectiveness, or value of a programme, product, project, process, objective, or curriculum.  Evaluation uses inquiry and judgment methods, including: (1) determining standards for judging quality and deciding whether those standards should be relative or absolute; (2) collecting relevant information; and (3) applying the standards to determine quality.

(Educational evaluation:  Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines)

Assessment:

      The process of gathering and collecting information from multiple and diverse sources in order to develop a deep understanding of what students know, and can do with their knowledge as a result of their education experiences.  The process culminates when assessment results are used to improve subsequent learning.

(Teaching effective programme: University of Oregon)

A.  Introduction

Assessment is part and parcel of teaching and learning (TL).  Every teacher carries out some kind of assessment during teaching but some of them may not be helpful for improving teaching and learning which is the main purpose of doing assessment.  This chapter provides some guidelines that would give the basic knowledge for carrying out assessment in a systematic way and to reap benefits from such efforts.

“Assessment and instructions are both related, if you don’t make that connection, then assessments are not meaningful and don’t help us at all” (Higuchi, 1995)


  

Assessment effort is aimed at collecting quantitative or qualitative data to assess gains in knowledge, skills, values and behaviour.  This chapter will give considerable amount of attention to assessing human values development as human values development has been designated as the core learning area in the integrated curriculum of the HVBWSHE programme. 

B.  Purpose

There are many aspects to be considered in a systematic assessment.  To begin with a teacher has to be clear about the purpose of assessment. Often, an assessment on TL is carried out with one or more of the following purposes:

  1. To determine the extent to which the objectives of TL have been attained;
  2. To monitor students’ progress;
  3. To provide feedback information for improving TL.

In addition, if a TL is conducted under an experimental project, as in the HVBWSHE project, assessment has to provide feedback data that will feed into an overall project evaluation.

C.  Principles/Guideline

Understanding the basic guidelines of assessment will help to increase its validity, reliability and usefulness.  Some of the important pointers are provided below.  A number of them are concerned with assessing human values development, the subject of main concern in the HVBWSHE project.

C.1  Assessment of TL should have high validity

Validity:

      Validity refers to whether the data collected actually reflect the phenomena to be observed or studied.  For example, if the objective of a lesson requires students to list three ways to conserve water, then an paper-and-pencil objective test asking students to list the various ways of conserving water is appropriate.


  

a.   It is necessary to examine the objectives intended for a lesson.  The assessment strategies adopted and the information collected must then be able to help teachers answer the question, “To what extent have the lesson objectives been achieved?” 

      The behavioural terms in the objective statement of a lesson plan should be referred to for selecting the appropriate assessment strategies and relevant data to be collected.  For example, if an objective statement states that students are able to evaluate the extent of environment damage caused by the construction of a dam then an oral or written test, or an interview can be conducted to find out students’ ability to carry out the task.  Sometimes, objective statements are too broad and abstract especially in relation to the inculcation of values, such as “ to understand how a hydraulic break work,” or “to appreciate the contribution of water to health,”  In such cases, it is advisable to restate objective statements in more specific, manageable and concrete terms.

b.   Assessment should also cover the domains of knowledge, intellectual, social and psychomotor skills in line with the specific requirement of the particular lessons.

C.2  Assessment should have high reliability

Reliability:

      Reliability is the extent to which an assessment is repeatable and yields consistent scores.

 

Note:  In order to be valid, a test must be reliable; but reliability does not guarantee validity. Reliability can be improved by: (i) getting repeated measurements using the same test and; (ii) getting many different measures using slightly different techniques and methods.
  
  1. Inter-rater reliability:  Values assessments are susceptible to subjective interpretation, personal bias and lack of consistency, resulting in low inter-rater reliability in assessment.  Therefore, it is expected that no single method by itself can give an adequate depiction of human values development. To enhance the reliability of the assessment, various methods of assessment may be used to evaluate a lesson or student from multiple angles. 
  1. The reliability and validity of observation may also be reduced by halo effect and Hawthorne effect.  Halo effect refers to the tendency of evaluators to give a person the same ratings on all variables following the rating of one of the variables.  The Hawthorne effect refers to the influence of attention on students who are being observed.  Often, under observation certain unauthentic behaviour are put up for the observers.  

C.3 Both formative and summative assessments are necessary. 

Formative assessments are carried out continuously to monitor students’ progress and seek immediate information on the strengths and weaknesses of teaching and learning, so that decisions can be made on whether to continue with the same strategies or to take appropriate actions to overcome any weaknesses found in the TL process.  Summative assessments are conducted at the end of a course mainly to give information about achievement. 

C.4 Assessment can be done in formal and informal ways.  The modes of formal assessment include:

  1. paper-and-pencil tests on knowledge and skills
  2. oral and practical and performance tests on skills, moral reasoning (responding to moral situation) etc. 

Informal assessment can be done by:

  1. observing students’ attitudes, actions and behaviour
  2. interviewing students, parents and other stakeholders on their perceptions, feelings and behaviour. 
  3. examining the daily work produced by students
  4. examining students’ self report and reflections in journals

C.5  Indicators

Indicators serve as milestones to show the state of development or progress of students/teaching and learning. Indicators may be arranged in hierarchical order.  Teachers can refer to the taxonomy of educational behaviours for both cognitive domain (Blooms, 1963) and affective domain (Krathwol et al., 1963) for more knowledge and to enhance the ability to formulate indicators.
Some examples of indicators are given below. The list is not exhaustive because the manner of integrating values-based water content is variable and the range of subject areas involved is also very wide among countries taking part in the HVBWSHE project.  

C.5.1  Examples of Indicators in the Cognitive Domain

Students are able to:

  1. Recall a fact or concept, e.g. the causes of water pollution
  2. Predict a future event, e.g. the amount of water needed by a certain pop in 10 years’ time
  3. Use knowledge to solve problems, e.g. addition and multiplication to calculate water bill
  4. Analyse a problem, e.g. what are the various activities contributing to the shortage of water supply to the urban poor
  5. Synthesise information, e.g. gather information from various sources to write an article
  6. Evaluate a programme, e.g. evaluate a certain policy with regard to the supply of water
  7. Give reasons or rationalise an action, e.g. reasons to support building a dam
  8. Relate a happening, an action or an event to another, e.g. deforestation and floods
  9. Create something useful – draw a poster to depict the sufferings when water is in shortage

C.5.2  Examples of Indicators in the Affective Domain

Students are:

  1. Aware of certain values but have not put them into practice, e.g. how water is used in religious practice
  2. Able to perform some activities under instruction, e.g. turn off taps while brushing teeth
  3. Express willingness to practice certain values, e.g. state willingness to collect rain water for gardening purpose
  4. Voluntarily or choose to practice certain values, e.g. report leaking water pipes in public areas
  5. Practice certain values persistently & consistently, e.g. relentlessly advocating lower water cost for poor people
  6. Persuade others to practice certain values, e.g. participate in campaigns advocating water conservation

C.5.3  Examples of Indicators According to the Thematic Strands

The following are some examples of indicators for the four thematic strands of the Integrated Curriculum:

  1. Water and Environmental Sustainability

Knowledge

  1. Recall concept of water conservation
  2. Recall the methods used to save water
  3. Acquire laboratory and practical/manipulative skills to conduct investigation and seek knowledge about water and environmental sustainability

Thinking Skills

  1. Give reasons why one should use recycled water for gardening
  2. Relate current water conservation effort to the welfare of future generations
  3. Critically examine human activities that affect water resources and the environment

Values

  1. Express willingness to save water in daily life

Behaviour

  1. Turn off the tap while brushing teeth (and many other activities)
  2. Take part in water saving campaign
  3. Persuade others to save water

Knowledge on the Values of Water

  1. Able to list the functions of water
  2. State that water is important to health
  3. Explain that water is part of the structural component of many chemicals
  4. Gather information and make a report about the use of water in industry
  5. Explain hydroelectric power is produced

Values – Taking social responsibility

  1. Inform others through writings about the importance of water in life/religious practices/recreation
  2. Report cases of tempering water meter
  3. Promote justice in costing water distribution to the poor

2.   Water and Culture
Knowledge

  1. Sing a water festival song, e.g. Loi Krathong
  2. Express the mood of Loi Krathong orally or in writing, highlighting human values such as respect, sharing, co-operation, orderliness, public spiritedness

Values

  1. Aware of the need to have water conservation
  2. Turn off water tap while brushing teeth (and many other activities)
  3. Express willingness to take part in water conservation
  4. Participate in campaign on the prudent use of water
  5. Persuade others to conserve water

      (I have lost my note. I believe I did more examples in other themes in INNOTECH)

D.  Methods and Instrument

There are various methods and instruments to serve various assessment purposes. It is always a challenge for teachers to choose the right methods and instrument in assessment. This section introduces some methods and instrument relevant to the HVBWSHE project. To select the appropriate tools for assessment, it is necessary to know the functions, strengths and weaknesses of each tool and match this knowledge with the objectives of learning and the resources and conditions of the classroom.

The table below shows some of the important methods and their instrument, functions, and strengths and weaknesses.

Assessment Methods

Instrument

Functions

Strengths and Weaknesses

Observation

Checklist
Attitudes scale
Anecdote

Collect information on how students interact with peers, participate in events and conducting daily life.
Examples:
In informal situation, such as observing students’:

  1. habit of using water in daily life
  2. co-operation in project work
  3. practice of healthy lifestyle
  4. participation in cultural and religious events

Strengths

  1. be carried out in authentic situations
  2. provide data that are difficult to collect through other means.
  3. gather data to supplement or verify information.

Weaknesses

  1. Low reliability due to observers’ individual values perception
  2. Inconsistency of the observers
  3. Halo effect *
  4. Hawthorne effect**
  5. Time consuming
  6. Difficult to handle groups of students

Interview

Interview questionnaire

Get in-depth views and of students’ values perception, practices in daily life and views on social issues and improving teaching and learning.
Examples:

  1. Food students take at home
  2. Views on water rate
  3. Feedback from parents about students’ behaviour
  4. Views on evironmental issue

Strengths

  1. Provides the opportunity for in depth conversation with students
  2. Can yield rich data
  3. Questions can be clarified if necessary
  4. Teachers can ask additional questions
  5. Useful for gathering data from younger students

Weaknesses

  1. Interviews and data analysis can be time consuming
  2. If the interview is poorly planned, the data may be difficult to analyze
  3. Respondents do not have anonymity 
  4. Possibility of interviewer bias
  5. Data does not lend itself easily to quantification

Moral reasoning

Moral dilemmas

To find out students’ ability to provide rationale or apply moral principles to justify actions in controversies.

 

Examples:

  1. A justifiable solution to the dispute of water supply across national border
  2. The justification of distribution of clean water to the urban poor

Strength
Demonstrate the levels of students’ ability to apply moral principles in reasoning that are difficult to obtain from other methods of assessment
Weakness

  1. Difficult to construct good moral dilemmas
  2. Reasoning ability is not consistent with moral values held and practices

Self reporting

-reflection
-journaling

Guideline of reflection and journal writing:

  1. learning objectives
  2. questions to guide reflections and journal writing
  3. format of presentation
  4. criteria of grading
  1. Providing a comprehensive feedback on the performance of the students throughout the instructional period.
  2. Get information on students’ in-depth thoughts and analyses about an issue.
  3. Values perception on importance of water and social issues
  4. Reflection on behaviour and habits

Strengths

  1. Deeper thoughts and analyses of situations
  2. Students are more willing to give true picture
  3. Individualised assessment

Weakness
What have been reported may have low correlation to learning objectives

Portfolio

Guideline of assessment:
Sample of learning outcomes to be assessed  and criteria of grading

To obtain information about students’ progress throughout the instructional period, especially to fill up the information that cannot be provided by formative and summative tests.

Strengths

  1. Very comprehensive data to get a more valid picture of students’ abilities and performance
  2. Observe students in a broader context: taking risks, developing creative solutions, and solving problems
  3. Flexibility to suit individuals’ learning styles
  4. Gather evidence from both formal and informal assessment
  5. Easily jive assessment to learning process

Weakness
Need space to keep all the evidence submitted

Paper-and-pencil test

Test papers
-objective test
-essay test

Knowledge
Aptitudes
Application of human values in moral reasoning
Understanding the concept of sustainability
The importance of water
The role of water in human body
Justice and equity in accessing water
Gender equity in accessibility to facilities

Strengths

  1. Fair for a selection test because every student is tested on the same items.
  2. The conditions when a test is conducted is controlled so that it is the same for every student
  3. Grading is relatively more objective as compared to observation.

Weaknesses

  1. Only a small sample of the learning experience or low content validity
  2. Not authentic
  3. Writing ability plays a part in essay test

Two phenomena that reduce the reliability of assessment often encountered are the Halo Effect and the Hawthorne Effect.
*    Halo effect refers to the tendency of a grader to give the same ratings to all items following the rating of one of the items. 
**  Hawthorne effect refers to the influence of attention on students who are being observed.  Students may put up some unauthentic behaviours for observers.  

D.1 Observation

In planning systematic observations, the teachers must consider where, what, how, and when an assessment is to be carried out.

D.1.1.              Types of Observations

Structured observation:

  1. Observe only activities, events, or behaviour relevant using observation guide
  2. Usually used in non-participant or controlled observations

Unstructured observation:

  1. Flexible and open
  2. Usually used in the participant observation

Participant (PO)

  1. The observer personally takes part in the activities of the things or groups being observed

Non-participant (NPO)

  1. The observers do not participate in the activity of the group
  2. The observer merely stand by and observes the things or groups he or she is studying
  

D.1.2. Qualities of a good Observer

  1. The observer should possess efficient sense organs.
  2. The observer must be able to estimate rapidly and accurately.
  3. The observer must possess sufficient alertness to observe several details simultaneously.
  4. The observer must be able to control the effects of his personal prejudices.
  5. The observer should be in good physical condition.
  6. The observer must be able to record immediately and accurately the results of his observations.

D.1.3.  Checklist

A checklist is a listing of specific criteria which a teacher looks for, and indicates the presence or absence of a particular trait in a learning experience.

a.  Use of Checklists
Sample Forms of Checklists

  1. Problem Solving Observation Checklist
  2. Science Observation Sheet
  3. Checklist on Mechanics of the Classroom Interaction
  4. Teaching Observation Checklist
  5. Science Observation Checklist
  6. Cooperative Learning: Classroom Observation
  7. Observation Form by Johnson & Johnson
  8. Teacher Observation Form

Checklists are used to record whether students have acquired certain knowledge, skills, thinking processes, abilities and attitudes with respect to an identified activity.  They provide information about where instruction has been successful, and where students require further instruction.  Formats for checklists should be varied and easy to use.  Some guidelines for constructing and using checklists are as follow:

  1. Determine the observation criteria from curriculum objectives and student needs.
  2. Choose criteria that are easily observable to avoid vagueness and increase objectivity.
  3. Use jargon-free language to describe criteria so that data can be used effectively to inform students or parents/guardians.
  4. In most cases, limit the number of criteria to eight and the number of students observed to three or four at one time in order to keep the assessment task manageable..
  5. Analyse and summarise checklist data regularly.
  6. Use yes-no checklists to identify whether a specific action has been completed or if a particular quality is present.
  7. Use tally checklists to note the frequency of the action observed.
  8. Construct all checklists with space for recording anecdotal comments and summaries.

D.1.4.  Attitudes Scale

Attitudes are enduring patterns of belief which it is believed are predictive of behaviour.   If a student expresses positive attitudes about the service of a local Water Board, he will be more likely to turn up for a campaign organised by the Board.

There are several types of attitudes scales but the two most common ones are Thurstone Scale  and Likert Scale

Thurstone scale has a choice of two possible responses, such as: “agree” or “disagree” or a pair of antagonistic characteristics (see Appendix I)

In Likert scale, a respondent is provided with a range of possible responses (see Appendix I).

D.1.5.  Anecdote

Anecdote is defined as “an account of someone,” describing what a n evaluator notice about a student in the beginning and how he or she has changed then.  The changes may include affective changes, such as independence, group participation and cheerfulness

Anecdotal evidence is an informal account of evidence in the form of an anecdote or hearsay.  The term is often used in contrast to scientific evidence.  Therefore, the reliability of anecdotal assessment may not be high.
An anecdotal record may have two components: descriptive and analytical.  Descriptive component tells story of the incident indicating changes after instructions are given.  Analytical component categorises changes to provide a scheme for documenting the changes.

D.2  Interview

An interview is a purposeful conversation, usually between two people (but sometimes involving more) that is directed by one in order to get information.  Interview can take place on the spur of the moment when there is time to spare.  The teachers can also arrange for more formal interviews with the students.  Some pointers to remember when conducting interview

  1. Use an audio tape recorder. Listen to the tapes before the next interview and note down any mistakes you may have made. For instance, did you give enough “wait-time” to the pupils before you spoke again?
  2. An interviewer should appropriately wait up to 10 or 15 seconds for a response. However, the “wait-time” should not be as long as a minute or two because a pupil would freeze up if he/she was stared at for too long.
  3. Rephrase or restructure your question if a pupil does not respond in 6 or 10 seconds. This is because he/she may not know the answer or may not have understood the question.
  4. When you are interviewing pupils about their current understanding, for example, science concepts, do not ask questions that can steer the pupils towards new understanding.
  5. Be thoroughly familiar with the topics of enquiry so that you can respond with appropriate follow-up questions when the pupils give responses that may seem “wrong”.
  6. If possible, find a suitable, quiet place with no interruptions to conduct the interviews.

Effective interviewing of school children

When interviewing school children, teachers need to consider some of the points listed below for effective interviewing. They include:

  1. being a sympathetic, interested and attentive listener without dominating the discussion;
  2. being neutral with respect to subject matter and not expressing opinions or betraying feelings of surprise or disapproval of what a child says;
  3. being relaxed and not trying to hurry the pupils into giving an answer;
  4. reassuring the pupils that their opinions are important and there is no one answer to any questions that are asked;
  5. phrasing the questions similarly each time and keeping the outline of the interview questions on hand; and
  6. being prepared to rephrase a question but not to give an “answer” to the question in the process of rewording it.
  7. Select comfortable surroundings for the interview
  8. Make sure that the interviews are not too long.  About half an hour to 40 minutes is about right
  9. Have some idea about what you want to ask.  This will, of course, depend on the topic and what aspects you are investigating.  Semi-structured interviews allow you to probe further during the interview
  10. If you intend to ask factual questions start with them
  11. Start with a simple question
  12. Explain the purpose of interview in a positive way.  I always start with “I need your help to find out more about…” or “I am working on a project about how to help children … and what you are going to tell me will certainly help.”
  13. Ensure anonymity so that the interviewee feels relax
  14. Try not to convey your opinion at the interview
  15. Avoid leading questions such as “when I ask you what 5 and 5 makes, did you use your fingers? “Spellings are easy for you, are they not?”
  16. Use open-ended questions.  Questions which start with, for example, “what is your…,” “who is…” or “do you like History?” do provide information but useful ways of gathering fuller and richer answers would be to ask questions in the form:  “That is interesting.  Tell me more” or “How do you explain to someone who does not know anything about it?”
  17. Sometimes it is fruitful to interview a group of students together.  It is important to keep children focused in a group interview.
  18. Always review responses to interviewee and refines procedures and questions if necessary

D.3  Moral Reasoning

Moral reasoning begins with a moral dilemma. To facilitate reasoning, a moral dilemma embeds two or more values acceptable in viewed from different perspectives.  For example, values involving love versus public spiritedness in deciding whether to report a close relative who has tempered with water meter.

A student is compelled to choose a course of action for the situation followed by reasons drawn from his or her prioritized value systems.

The role of teachers is to evaluate the reasons given.  There are at least two ways to evaluate the reasons.  One method is to come a conclusion whether a student is able or not to apply values into his or her reasoning process.  The grading is just a mere “able” or “unable.”.  A more sophisticated way is to grade the reasoning according to the hierarchy of moral reasoning developed by Kohlberg (1963) and Rest (1999) et al. 

An example of  Moral Dilemma

In order to prevent a severe flood in Bangkok, there was a proposal to redirect the water in the upper Chao Phraya River to the nearby areas in Ayutthaya and Ang Thong.  However, this action would destroy crops and flood the houses in the two areas concerned, and thereby, causes hardship to the residents.  You are given the authority to take an action. Would you want to redirect the flow of water? What are the reasons for your choice?

D.4  Self Reporting

Two common modes of self reporting are reflection and journal writing.

D.4.1  Reflection

Reflection is an analysis of events, thoughts, or insights into the impact of an experience or projected goals for the future.  It can used to assess students’ growth and development by comparing recent reflection with those in the past.

Reflection involves rethinking, deeper thinking, and recalling.  There should be some kinds of guidance although the structure of this may not be very rigid.  Some phrases or questions may be given to help students to direct their reflection on the desired topics and to record their reflection:

Guidance for Reflection

Guidance in the form of sentence completion:

  1. This week I learn about ……………………………………………………
  2. My question(s) to my teacher is(are) ………………………………………

Guidance in the form of questions:

  1. What have you learn about yourselves from the lessons this week?
  2. What happen?
  3. What did you feel about the incident this morning?
  4. Why did it happen this way?
  5. What new issues have risen from this action?

Reflection is best done when the environment is calm and quiet.  Also, the recording of reflection may be free from structure.  Expression of thoughts is more important than ability to write.  If necessary, records may include graphics for students who have low writing ability..   

D.4.2  Journaling

  1. Journaling is a means for recording personal thoughts, daily experiences, observations, and evolving insights (Hiemstra, 2001)
  2. The entry in a journal needs not be in sentence form; a date and some key words or phrases, listed chronologically will be sufficient.
  3. Use a journal to react to and reflect upon ideas.

A Broad Outline to Guide Journaling

1.  Teachers may give some questions for students to answer, example:

  • What worked? What didn’t?
  • What have I accomplished?
  • What did I do? Was what I did good?
  • Record things that might be useful

Today’s Journal:  19 July 2006

2.   Please complete the following sentences to illustrate what you feel about the workshops for the last two days.

  • What was interesting about today (date)?

      I find this session is interesting . . . . . . . . . .

  • What was something new I learned?

      One thing I am learning is . . . . . . .

  • I find the activities relevant/not relevant

      because . . . . .

  • What did I begin to think about differently?
  • It is in the form of loose structure with guided questions to help students to:
 

(a)  explain their ideas in calm and quiet environment
(b)  do recording which is free from structure, do not need to care much about language error and expression is more important which may include graphics, picturesque reports, etc.

Examples of student’ reflective journals with picturesque report of field study (MS word)

  1. A portfolio is not a random collection of observations or student products.  It is a systematic way of assessment.  The observations recorded and the products of students’ work collected are related to major instructional goals.  For example, journals recorded by students over the year can serve as a reflection of the degree to which students are building positive attitudes and habits with respect to using water. 
  2. Portfolios are multifaceted. Because of its wealth of records, it is able to reflect the complex nature of various learning objectives.  Portfolio can consist of written work, drawing, video recording, compilation of collection of pictures, artefacts, and so forth.  The totality of the information gathered through such a wide variety of sources enhances the fairness, content coverage, meaningfulness and validity of assessment.
  3. Portfolio assessment should actively involve the students in the process of assessment.
  4. It can serve as evidence with regard to students’ progress and development.

Sample student's portfolio assessment on "Matter/Water"

 
drawings 

drawing2

drawing3

drawing5drawing4

 
drawing6 drawing7

D.6  Paper-and Pencil Test

In paper-and-pencil tests, students read questions and respond in writing. Paper-and-pencil tests can be used to assess knowledge, ability, interest and personality. The advantage of a paper-and-pencil test is that it can be used to assess many students at the same time. It can also be used to assess more complex and challenging mental processes.

a.  Types of paper-and-pencil test:

  1. Multiple choice questions
  2. Completion of sentences
  3. Short answers
  4. Essay

b.  Procedure of a paper-and-pencil test:

    • List topic areas/tasks;
    • Specify the response format, number of questions, the time limit and difficulty level;
    • Write test questions or items and develop scoring schemes;
    • Review questions and scoring schemes;
    • Administer the test; and
    • Mark and grade test papers.

    Attachment 7.1.

    Examples of Assessment Instrument

     Checklist

    An example of checklist

    Name      :     __________________________
    Class       :     __________________________
    Gender   :     __________________________

    Instruction:  Check (/) next to the values if the student you observe has demonstrated the values.

    Human Values

    (/)

    Love

    Caring

     

    Sharing

     

    Right Conduct

    Right conduct
    Self sacrifice

     

    Respect for others

     

    Services to others/Altruistic

     

    Honest

     

    Proper utilization of resources

     

    Truth

    Honest

     

    Truthful

     

    Non-violence

    Responsible towards common good

     

    Sense of social justice

     

    Readiness to cooperate

     

    Fellow feeling

     

    Consideration for others

     

    Peace

    Self discipline

     

    Integrity and self-respect

     

    Attitudes Scale

    There are several types of attitudes scales but the two most common ones are Thurstone and Likert Scales

    An example of graphic rating scale
    Thurstone scale has a choice of two possible responses, such as: “agree” or “disagree” or a pair of antagonistic characters as shown below:

    Check (/) beside the words that describe the character of the students you observed.  Only one / is allowed for each pair of description.

    __⁄__ Helpful
    ____ Argumentative

     

    __⁄__ Frugal
    ____ Wasteful

     

    In the Likert scale, a responded is provided with a range of possible responses as shown below:

    Instruction:  Circle the appropriate rating.     

    An example of numerical rating scale (Check one only)

    Check (/) beside the word besides the character of the student you observed.

    ____  1. Extremely hostile
    ____  2.  Hostile
    ____  3.  Antagonistic
    ____  4.  Evenly sociable
    __⁄__ 5.  Amicable
    ____  6.  Friendly
    ____  7.  Extremely friendly

    Moral Dilemma

    Instruction

    Read the following situation and then write down your action and reasons in the spaces provided.

    In order to prevent a severe flood in Bangkok, there was a proposal to redirect the water in the upper Chao Phraya River to the nearby areas in Ayutthaya and Ang Thong.  However, this action would destroy crops and flood the houses in the two areas concerned, and thereby, causes hardship to the residents.  You are given the authority to take an action. Would you want to redirect the flow of water? What are the reasons for your choice?

    a.   My decision is
    _______________________________________________________________

    b.   Give at least one reason to support your decision.
    _______________________________________________________________

    Grading systems:

    There is no score for part (a)
    For part (b), use either ONE of the following grading scheme:

     A.

    0 =  if there is not moral values mentioned in the reason
    1 =  if a relevant moral value is stated in the reason

    B. Determine whether a student’s reasoning has reached any of the following stages:

    Stage 1

    Punishment-obedience orientation

    Stage 2

    Instrumental relativist orientation

    Stage 3

    Interpersonal concordance orientation

    Stage 4

    Authority and social-order maintaining orientation

    Stage 5

    Social-contract legalistic orientation

    Stage 6

    Universal ethical principle orientation


    Attachment 7.2.

    Taxonomy :  Cognitive and Affective
    Kohlberg’s Levels of Moral Development

    KOHLBERG’S LEVELS OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT

    Level

    Stage

    Characteristics of Stage/Level

    A.     Preconventional

    Stage 1

    Punishment-obedience orientation

    Stage 2

    Instrumental relativist orientation

    B.     Conventional

    Stage 3

    Interpersonal concordance orientation

    Stage 4

    Authority and social-order maintaining orientation

    C.     Postconventional Autonomous, or Principled

    Stage 5

    Social-contract legalistic orientation

    Stage 6

    Universal ethical principle orientation

    The following is adapted from:  Krathwohl, D., Bloom, B., & Masia, B. (1956).  Taxonomy of educational objectives.  handbook II: Affective domain. New York:  David McKay.

    The taxonomy was developed to organize levels of commitment.  As such it could just as properly be discussed as a regulatory system issue in the model being presented here.

    Taxonomy of Educational Objectives

    Affective Domain

    Level

    Definition

    Example

    Receiving

    Being aware of or attending to something in the environ­ment

    Person would listen to a lecture of presentation about a structural model related to human behaviour.

    Responding

    Showing some new behaviour as a result of experience

    The individual would answer questions about the model or might rewrite lecture notes the next day.

    Valuing

    Showing some definite involvement or commitment

    The individual might begin to think how education may be modified to take advantage of some of the concepts presented in the model and perhaps generate a set of lessons using some of the concepts presented.

    Organisation

    Integrating a new value into one’s general set of values, giving it some ranking among one’s general priorities

    This is the level at which a person would begin to make long-range commitments to arranging his or her instruction and assessment relative to the model.

    Characterisation by Value

    Acting consistently with the new value

    All this highest level, a person would be the model to develop, select, or arrange instruction and would become known for that action.

    E.   References

    Asia and the Pacific Programme of Educational Innovation for Development. (1993).  Strategies and Methods for Teaching Values in Science and Technology.  Thailand: UNESCO Principal Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.

    Adprima (2007). Instructional Methods Information. http://www.adprima.com/ teachmeth.htm]

    Ahmad, H.Harun, Arfah, Khamis, Polyvine, N., Rungruangbangchan, N., Chanthabouly, K. & Ng, K.T. (2005). "Teachers as researchers exploring the effect of Active Learning Approaches (ALAp) to enhance students' interest in science learning using English as medium of instruction". Paper presented in parallel session and published in the Proceedings for International Conference on Science and Maths Education (CoSMEd). 6 to 8 December at RECSAM. ISSN: 967-930-012-9.

    Ang, S.H. (2007). “HVWSHE lesson plan ideas from Singapore” in HVWSHE resource pack for teachers in SEAMEO countries. SEAMEO SEAMOLEC-UN HABITAT.

    Bacungan, C., Vea, A., and Ladera, H. (1996).  Values Education.. QC: Katha Publishing Co., Inc.

    Balatbat, J.O., Cabog, M.C.V., Guillermo, S.L. & Tupas, M.V.M. (2007). “HVWSHE lesson plan ideas from Philippines” in HVWSHE resource pack for teachers in SEAMEO countries. SEAMEO SEAMOLEC-UN HABITAT.

    Bell, Judith. (1999) Doing your Research Project. (3rd ed.). UK, Viva Books
    Private Limited

    Benoza, B.E. (2006). “The SEAMEO-UN HABITAT Cooperation on Promoting Human Values in Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Education in Southeast Asian Schools: Project Overview”. Presentation compiled in the Proceedings of Regional Workshop on Developing Teaching and Learning Materials for Integrating Human Values in Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Education in Southeast Asian Schools. SEAMEO INNOTECH.

    Benoza, B., Jalun, K., Pannen, P., Parahakaran, S., Yeap, C.H. & Ng, K.T. (2007). “Monitoring/facilitation skills required by aspired trainers of HVWSHE for echo training” in Training of Trainers (TOT) Manual for HVWSHE. RECSAM-UN HABITAT.

    Benoza, B., Jumsai, N.A., Parahakaran, S. & Sarmiento, C.Q.S. (2007). “Water and environmentally sustainable development” in Training of Trainers (TOT) Manual for HVWSHE. SEAMEO RECSAM-UN HABITAT.

    Berkeley (2007). Knowledge Integration? Building on What students Know.    [Available at: http://clp.berkeley.edu/CLP/pages/overview.html]

    Best, John W. and  Kahn, JamesV. Khan (1993) Research in Education. (7th
    ed.). New Delhi. Prentice- Hall, Inc.

    Bureau of Secondary Education (2002).  Operations Handbooks in English, Science, and Mathematics: 2002 Basic Education Curriculum, Secondary Level.  Pasig City:  Department of Education.

    Bureau of Secondary Education (2002).  Prototype Lesson Plans in English, Science, Mathematics, Physics. Pasig City: Department of Education

    CDC (2006). Integrated Curriculum for Secondary Schools : Science Form 5. Ministry of Education Malaysia : Curriculum Development Centre.

    Clarke, J. and Agne, R. (1997).  Interdisciplinary High School Teaching:  Strategies for Integrated Learning.  USA:  Allyn and Bacon.

    Custodio, L. (ed.) (1983).  Education in and for Values in the Philippine Setting.  Manila: UST Press.

    Department of Education. (2002) The 2002 Basic Education Curriculum.  Department of Education, Pasig City.

    Esteban, E. (1990).  Education in Values:  What, Why and For Whom.  Manila:  Sinag-tala Publishers, Inc.

    Evangelista, E. Y. (2006), Integrating Values in Lesson: A Review of Concepts and Practices, Regional Workshop on Developing Teaching and Learning Materials for Integrating Human Values in Water, Hygiene and Sanitation Education in Southeast Asian Schools, Philippines.

    EduTech Wiki (2007). Instructional design model.
    [Available at: http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/Instructional_design_model]

    Evangelista, E.Y. (2006). “Integrating Human Values in Water and Sanitation Education with sample lesson plan from Department of Education (DepEd), Philippines”. Presentation compiled in the Proceedings of Regional Workshop on Developing Teaching and Learning Materials for Integrating HVWSHE in Southeast Asian Schools. INNOTECH.

    Fadzil, M.S. & Isma Fazlina, I. (2007). “HVWSHE lesson plan ideas from Brunei Darussalam” in HVWSHE resource pack for teachers in SEAMEO countries. SEAMEO SEAMOLEC-UN HABITAT.

    Fien, John, et al. (Eds.) (1996). Teaching for a Sustainable World: Environmental education for a new century. Australia : Griffith University.

    Gega, P.C. (1994). How to Teach Elementary School Science. U.S. : Macmillan Publishing Company, a division of Macmillan Inc.

    Herawati (2007). “HVWSHE lesson plan ideas from Indonesia” in HVWSHE resource pack for teachers in SEAMEO countries. SEAMEO SEAMOLEC-UN HABITAT.

    Herbert, J. and Attridge, C. (1975).  A guide for developers and users of
    observation systems and manuals. American educational research journal. 12 (1), 1-20.

    Higuchi, C. (1995). Critical issue integrating assessment and instruction in ways that support learning. [Available at http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/ methods/assment/char.htm]

    Hla Way, Thet Lwin, and Myo Thant Tyn (2002) Research Methods in Arts
    and Science.
    (1st ed.). Myanmar: Universities Press.

    http://chd.gse.gmu.edu/immersion/knowledgebase/[Learning theories and instruc­tional strategies].

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ [Definitions of terms]

    http://www.saskschools.ca/curr_content/teachlib/rbl/rblmain.htm. [Resource-based learning]

    http://global.finland.fi/julkaisut/yleis/pdme/

    http://www.adb.org/water [The ADB website on “Water for All”]

    http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/ [The website of the official World Water Day (22 March) with the theme “Coping with Water Scarcity” in year 2007]

    http://edugreen.teri.res.in/explore/air/ucando.htm (What you can do to reduce air pollution etc., play and learn: crossword puzzle, cartoon, jokes, poems, stories, etc. e.g. crossword for water http://edugreen.teri.res.in/play/ cross/water/cross2.htm).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water (Water).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_quality (Water quality).

    http://interactive2.usgs.gov/learningweb/teachers/lesson_plans_links.asp (Water education poster, lesson plans, etc).

    http://library.thinkquest.org/6076/New%20Pages/EnvGHEff.html. (The greenhouse effect and global warming with science, maths, technology, social science arts, creating own music, etc. in http://www.thinkquest.org/library/)

    http://library.thinkquest.org/6076/New%20Pages/EAirpoll.html (Acid rain, air pollution)

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/healthy_living/nutrition/drinks_water.shtml (Water and health,etc.)

    http://www.bpa.gov/Corporate/KR/ed/sold/toc.htm (Science outreach through learning discovery, lesson plans on water, etc.)

    http://www.challenge.state.la.us/k12act/data/water/Responses/index.html (Collaborative projects on water, impact, future, solution, etc.)

    http://www.col-ed.org/cur/science.html (Science lesson plans on water

    http://www.col-ed.org/cur/sci/sci24.txt, water pollution

    http://www.col-ed.org/cur/sci/sci26.txt, water quality

    http://www.col-ed.org/cur/sci/sci28.txt, water magic

    http://www.col-ed.org/cur/sci/sci95.txt, non-compressibility of water

    http://www.col-ed.org/cur/sci/sci127.txt, water conservation

    http://www.col-ed.org/cur/sci/sci161.txt, water cycle

    http://www.col-ed.org/cur/sci/sci190.txt, temperature and water density

    http://www.col-ed.org/cur/sci/sci212.txt,  etc.)

    http://www.doe.gov.my/ (Department of environment, water)

    http://www.ecologycenter.org/cwrp/ (Community water rights project)

    http://www.ecologycenter.org/tfs/results.php (Lesson plans on values, e.g. water and values

    http://www.ecologycenter.org/tfs/lesson.php?id=13517, simulating forest floor, water and values 

    http://www.ecologycenter.org/tfs/lesson.php?id=13469,  etc.)

    http://www.eere.energy.gov/redirects/eren.html (Energy efficiency and renewable energy)

    http://www.eia.doe.gov/kids/ (Energy facts, quiz, puzzles, field trips, activities, etc.)

    http://www.Enfo.ie/  (Water pollution, acid rain, air pollution, climate change, etc.)

    http://www.epa.gov/  (Environmental Protection Agency)

    http://www.epa.gov/airprogm/oar/oaqps/psihold.html (Acid rain, climate change, ozone depletion, toxic air pollutant, etc.)

    http://www.epa.gov/ozone/ (Ozone depletion, chemicals, etc.)

    http://www.epa.gov/recyclecity/  (Recycle city with games and activities)

    http://www.eduref.org/cgi-bin/printlessons.cgi/Virtual/Lessons/Science/Earth_ Scien­­ce/EAR0200.html (Lesson plan on water and earth science, etc.)

    http://www.inspiration.com/freetrial/index.cfm (Concept map software)

    http://www.lessonplanspage.com/SciExperiments.htm (Lesson plans on all sciences/maths, projects on water, etc.)

    http://www.loc.gov/rr/scitech/tracer-bullets/scifairtb.html (Science fair projects and resources)

    http://www.pacificnet.net/~mandel/Science.html (Scientific investigations involving water,etc)

    http://www.scienceacross.org (Interactive web-based learning programme for Science and Social Sciences)

    http://www.seaworld.org/index.asp (Seaworld, discovery, etc. with fun guide, games, etc.)

    http://www.vanaturally.com/sixthgrade/supplements.html (Matter project WET with supplementary resources http://www.projectwetusa.org/)

    http://www.zoomschool.com/subjects/rainforest/ (Rainforest with all sciences, language, geography/history, puzzles, games, maths/fun activities, etc.Kohlberg, L. (1984).  The psychology of moral development. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    http://trochim.cornell.edu/tutorial/brown/LauraTP.htm

    http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/sedu/peerobs/checklist.php

    http//www.clt.cornell.edu/campus/teach/faculty/Materials/Observationchecklist. pdf

    http://www.behavioralsafetynow.com/text/checklist.htm

    http://www.pitt.edu/~ciddeweb/FACULTY-DEVELOPMENT/FDS/observation. pdf

    http://www.4teachers.org/projectbased/checklist.

    Jeffery, N. and Wordways (Eds.) (2000). Getting Started: Using outcomes to integrate learning. Curriculum Council, Western Australia.    [By curriculum framework committee. Also available at http://www.curriculum.wa.edu.au/]

    Jumsai Na Ayudhya, A. (2003). “A Development of the Human Values Integrated Instructional Model Based on Intuitive Learning Concept”. Thailand: Chulalongkorn University. 

    Jumsai N.A., A. and Parahakaran, S. (2006). “HVWSHE: Experiences in Thailand and Human Values”. Presentation compiled in Proceedings of Regional Workshop on Developing Teaching and Learning Materials for Integrating HVWSHE in Southeast Asian Schools. Manila, Philippines: SEAMEO INNOTECH.

    Kanu, V. (2001). “Water education: a human values approch” in Water Education in African Cities. United Nations Centre for Human Settlements.

    Kemmis, S. and R. McTaggart(1988). The Action Research Planner, 3rd end, Geelong: Deakin University.

    Kettle, K.C. (2005). Managing the Integration of Culture into Development Programmes (MICDP) Workshop Concept. MICDP Workshop (24th to 28th October) organized by SEAMEO-SPAFA and sponsored by ASEAN Foundation at Bayview Park Hotel, Manila, Philippines. 

    Kimly, E. & Phearum, N. (2007). “HVWSHE lesson plan ideas from Cambodia” in HVWSHE resource pack for teachers in SEAMEO countries. SEAMOLEC-UN HABITAT.

    Kulbir Singh Sidhu, (2001) Methodology of Research in Education.
    New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Pvt.Ltd.

    LS Science for BD Menengah 1: Textbook (Page 38) www.water-ed.org

    Manivanh, S. & Wayakone, S. (2007). “HVWSHE lesson plan ideas from Lao PDR” in HVWSHE resource pack for teachers in SEAMEO countries. SEAMEO SEAMOLEC-UN HABITAT.

    Massachusetts Department of Education (1996). Mathematics Curriculum Framework: Guiding principles in Achieving Mathematical Power. January 1996.
    [Available at http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/math/1996/guiding.html]

    McQueen, Ronald A. and Knussen (1999) Research Methods in Psychology:      A practical Introduction, London: Prentice Hall.

    Millar, R. and Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. The report of a seminar series funded by the Nuffield Foundation. King’s College London.  

    Moral Development http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/co/affsys/values.html

    Ng, K.T. & Abdullah, A. (2002). “Enhancing Science Learning Using ICT : A Reflective Study” in International Conference on the Challenge of Learning and Teaching in a Brave New World : Issues and Opportunities in Borderless Education (COLT 2002) Conference Proceedings. Organized by Hatyai City College and IKRAK, UUM from 14-16 October, 2002 at Hatyai.

    Ng, K.T. & Fong, S.F. (2004). “Linking students through project-based learning via ICT integration” Country paper presented in APEC Seminar on Best Practices and Innovations in the Teaching and Learning of Science and Maths at the Secondary Level (18-22 July) and  published in Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology (my.JET). Vol. 4, No. 2, December 04.

    Ng, K.T., Jumsai, N.A., A. & Seetharam, K.E. (2007). “Cross-cultural/interdisciplinary approaches to HVWSHE incorporating recreational and active learning strategies to enhance multiple intelligences” in Training of Trainers (TOT) Manual for HVWSHE. SEAMEO RECSAM-UN HABITAT.

    Ng, K.T., Lee, S.M. & Chokalingam, A. (2007). “Understanding various sociocultural issues, societal and environmental problems related to water via critical/creative thinking, field studies and issues-based approaches incorporating ICT” in Training of Trainers (TOT) Manual for HVWSHE. SEAMEO RECSAM-UN HABITAT.

    Ng, K.T., Sivalingam, P.M., Seetharam, K.E., Tan, H.N. & Jalun, K. (2007). “Water for health, sanitation and recreation” in Training of Trainers (TOT) Manual for HVWSHE. SEAMEO RECSAM-UN HABITAT.

    Ng, K.T., Toh, L., Tan, K.A. & Teoh, B.T. (2007). “Contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approaches with exemplary constructivist project/problem-based learning via ICT” in Training of Trainers (TOT) Manual for HVWSHE. SEAMEO RECSAM-UN HABITAT.

    Pannen, P. (2002). Contextual Constructivism: Creative Teaching trough Indigenous Arts, Bangkok: Asian Scholarship Foundation and Ford Foundation Bangkok.

    Pannen, P. (2006). in Regional Workshop on Developing Teaching and Learning Materials for Integrating Human Values in Water, Hygiene and Sanitation Education in Southeast Asian Schools, Philippines.

    Pannen, P. and Rodriguez, C.S. (2006). “Integrating HVWSHE: Guidelines for lesson planning  with assessment sheet, activity worksheet and evaluation form”. Presentation compiled in Proceedings of Regional Workshop on Developing Teaching and Learning Materials for Integrating HVWSHE in Southeast Asian Schools. Manila: SEAMEO INNOTECH.

    Pannen, P., Rodriguez, C.S., Ramli, A.I., Parahakaran, S. & Wahyudi, Y. (2007). “Water in culture, traditions and religious practices” in Training of Trainers (TOT) Manual for HVWSHE. SEAMEO RECSAM-UN HABITAT.

    Parahakaran, S. (2006). Teaching Human Values in Academic Contexts, Regional Workshop on Developing Teaching and Learning Materials for Integrating Human Values in Water, Hygiene and Sanitation Education in Southeast Asian Schools, Philippines.

    Phan, T.H. & Tran Thi H.L. (2007). “HVWSHE lesson plan ideas from Vietnam” in HVWSHE resource pack for teachers in SEAMEO countries. SEAMOLEC-UN HABITAT.

    Pitre, B.G. (2006). “Experiential learning and Curriculum foundations”. Presentation compiled in Proceedings of Regional Workshop on Developing Teaching and Learning Materials for Integrating HVWSHE in Southeast Asian Schools. Manila: SEAMEO INNOTECH.

    Portfolio Assessment. http://www.eduplace.com/rdg/res/literacy/assess6.html
    Punsalan, T.G. (2006). An evaluation of the implementation of the 2002 BEC values integration program (Report No. 83. Manila, Philippine Normal University, Center for Research and Development in Education)

    Quisumbing, L. (2003). “Citizenship education for better world societies: a holistic approach” in Training Manual on Values Across the Curriculum: Values Education and Values Integration Workshop.

    Rodriguez, C.S., Robert Peter, D., Chokalingam, A., Benoza, B. & Pannen, P. (2007). “Technological tools to explore HVWSHE issues and practices” in Training of Trainers (TOT) Manual for HVWSHE. SEAMEO RECSAM-UN HABITAT.

    SAA (1997). Science Across America (SAA) News. Vol. No. 1, Spring 1997.

    Sadker, M. P., and D. M. Sadker (1991). Teachers, Schools, and Society, (2nd edition), New York: McGraw Hill, Inc, 299

    Sarkar, A. (2006). “UN-HABITAT’s Water for African and Asian Cities Programmes: Experiences with HVWSHE”. Presentation compiled in the Proceedings of Regional Workshop on Developing Teaching and Learning Materials for Integrating Human Values in Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Education in Southeast Asian Schools. SEAMEO INNOTECH. 

    Saskatoon Public Schools (2007). Instructional Strategies Online.
    [Available at: http://olc.spsd.sk.ca/DE/PD/instr/direct.html] 

    Seetharam, L. and Seetharam, K.E. (2005). “ValuesIntegration for Developing Young Adults (VIDYA)”. Institute of Sathya Sai Education. In Seetharam, L. (2006). “Workshop on Values Integration”. Presentation compiled in the Proceedings of Regional Workshop on Developing Teaching and Learning Materials for Integrating HVWSHE in Southeast Asian Schools. Manila, Philippines: SEAMEO INNOTECH. 

    Seetharam, K.E. (2006). “7 Value-based Lessons Learned: Impact Evaluation Study (IES) of Water Supply and Sanitation Projects”. Asian Development Bank. Presentation compiled in the Proceedings of Regional Workshop on Developing Teaching and Learning Materials for Integrating HVWSHE in Southeast Asian Schools. SEAMEO INNOTECH. 

    Slavin, R.E. (1991). Student Team Learning: A Practical Guide to Cooperative Learning. Washington: NEA.

    Suwansiri, W. & Tojinda, N. (2007). “HVWSHE lesson plan ideas from Thailand” in HVWSHE resource pack for teachers in SEAMEO countries. SEAMOLEC-UN HABITAT.

    Tan, E. (1989).  The Clarification and Integration of Values.  Quezon City.

    Tan, H.N. & Ramli, A.I. (2007). “HVWSHE lesson plan ideas from Malaysia” in HVWSHE resource pack for teachers in SEAMEO countries. SEAMOLEC-UN HABITAT.

    Task Force on Values Education and Ethical Behavior. (1985). 1984 and Beyond: A Reaffirmation of Values. Maryland: Baltimore County Public Schools.

    Tej, P. (1990). Authentic mathematics assessment. Practical assessment, research and evaluation. [Available online: http://ericae.net/pare].

    Tomlinson, P. and Quinton, M. (eds.). (1986).  Values Across the Curriculum.  London and Philadelphia:  The Falmer Press

    Turner, Mike. (n. d.) “Placing a Value on Values”.  Retrieved on 18 November 2006 from the Internet: http://www.phrontis.com/values.htm

    UNESCO National Commission of the Philippines (UNACOM) Education Committee Project. (1997).  Values Education for the Filipino:  Revised Version of the DECS Values Education Program.  Manila: UNACOM.

    UN-HABITAT (2003). Report of the Regional Consultations on Values-based Water Education for Asia and the Pacific. Water for Asian Cities Programme: A Collaborative Initiative of UN-HABITAT (United Nations Human Settlements Programme) and the Asian Development Bank (ADB).

    Vosniadou, S. (January – June 2004). How children learn. INNOTECH Newsletter, 8-12.

    Worthen, B. R. & Sanders, J.R. (1987).  Educational evaluation:  Alternative approaches and practical guidelines   22–23.  White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Yeap, C.H. & Ng, K.T. (2006). “Assessment Methods in Teaching Human Values” Presentation compiled in the Proceedings of Regional Workshop on Developing Teaching and Learning Materials for Integrating HVWSHE in Southeast Asian Schools. INNOTECH.

    Yeap, C.H. (2007). “Thematic Strands” in HVWSHE resource pack for teachers in SEAMEO countries. SEAMEO SEAMOLEC-UN HABITAT.

    Yeap, C.H., Chan, N.W., Baharulnizam, B. & Teoh, B.T. (2007). “Water, human dignity and social equity” in Training of Trainers (TOT) Manual for HVWSHE. SEAMEO RECSAM-UN HABITAT.

    Yeap, C.H., Cheah, U.H. & Chavez, J. (2007). “Values, reasoning, decision making and problem-solving in various disciplines towards achieving human dignity and social equity” in Training of Trainers (TOT) Manual for HVWSHE. SEAMEO RECSAM-UN HABITAT.

    Yeap, C.H. & Ng, K.T. (2007). “Assessment/evaluation skills for HVWSHE” in Training of Trainers (TOT) Manual for HVWSHE. SEAMEO RECSAM-UN HABITAT.