|
|
Appendix
V
Preservice
Teacher Training and Teacher Professional
Development in the Use of ICTs in the Teaching of
Mathematics and Science in SEAMEO
Member Countries
A draft Report prepared by the SEAMEO Australia
Research Team led by Associate Professor Toni Downes,
University of Western Sydney.
Executive
Summary
November 2002
|
Project
Personnel
Project Taskforce
Dr
Arief S Sadiman (Chair)Director, SEAMEO Secretariat
Associate Professor Toni Downes (Project Leader), University of
Western Sydney, Australia
Mr Fadjar
Shadiq, Teacher Training Center for Mathematics, Indonesia
Professor Dr Soekartawi, Director, SEAMEO SEAMOLEC, Indonesia
Mr Tan Khun, Director, SEAMEO RECSAM, Malaysia
Mr Ahmad Hozibin Hm. Abd. Rahman, Head of Mathematics and Science
Section, Curriculum
Development Centre, MOE Malaysia
Dr Kla Somtrakool, Advisor to MOE Thailand
Dr Pornpun Waitayangkoon, Assistant to the President, Institute
for the Promotion of Teaching Science & Technology (IPST), Thailand
Professor Dr Nguyen Huu Chau, Vice Director, National Institute
of Educational Science, Vietnam
Professor Dr Nguyen Thuy Van, Acting Director, SEAMEO RETRAC, Vietnam
|
Project
Research Team
Assoc
Prof Toni Downes (Project Leader), University of Western Sydney,
Australia
Mr Tan Khun, Director, SEAMEO RECSAM, Malaysia
Ms Dale Scott, Research Assistant
Mr Ralph Leonard Project Consultant
Ms Joan Warhurst (Project Management), Executive Director, Australian
Curriculum Studies Association
|
Australian
Reference Group
Dr
Peter Aubusson, Senior Lecturer, Science Education, University of
Technology, Sydney.
Emeritus Professor Neil Baumgart, University of Western Sydney
Marjorie Colville, Australian Association of Science Teachers
Professor Richard Gunstone, Science and Technology Education, Monash
University
Mr Will Morony, Executive Director, Australian Association for Mathematics
Teachers
Associate Professor Beth Southwell, Associate Professor in Mathematics
Education,
University of Western Sydney
Ms Michelle Williams, President, Australian Council for Computers
in Education
|
SEAMEO
Secretariat
Mr
Abdul Wahid bin Sulaiman, Deputy Director Programme & Marketing
Dr Nora N Quetulio, Programme Officer (Development)
|
Executive
Summary
The Australia SEAMEO Project on Pre service Teacher Training and
Teacher Professional Development in the Use of ICT in the Teaching
of Mathematics and Science in SEAMEO Member Countries focuses on
improving pre-service and inservice teacher education for the long
term goal of improved student learning in the fields of mathematics
and science using Information and Communications Technology (ICT).
The Project brings together evidence and experience in three vitally
important areas: mathematics and science education; the use of ICT
in teaching and learning; and teacher learning. This report explores
the connections between the three areas and uses knowledge acquired
about the current situation of relevant pre-service and in-service
training in the participating countries to develop two models for
future activity. These models have been designed to accommodate
differences in education systems, national infrastructure and human
and financial resources between and within countries in the region.
|
Four
critical components for effective development
A recurring theme within the report is the attention to the four
components of Infrastructure, Governance, Applications and People
and the manner in which these interact to determine the capacity
of an educational system to implement curriculum applications of
ICTs. The components are defined as follows:
|
| |
a. |
Infrastructure:
physical equipment, operating systems, networking, software, architecture
of classrooms |
| |
b. |
Governance:
policies, curriculum frameworks, examinations systems, management |
| |
c. |
Applications:
curriculum uses |
| |
d. |
People:
skills, training and development programmes, school leadership, community
expectations and readiness,
|
Because
of the interaction between the components, it is desirable to ensure
that the extent of development in any one of them complements the
current state of the others. Large investment in infrastructure
will not provide a corresponding improvement in the overall use
of ICTs in education if people's skill levels are insufficient to
use fully the additional capacity. Conversely, a lack of access
to infrastructure will inhibit a teacher's opportunity to use the
skills acquired through training programmes. Consideration of these
four components is just as relevant at the level of an individual
school as it is at the scale of national programmes.
This report places emphasis on the People component, and argues
that it is not necessary to deploy significant infrastructure first,
before progress can be made in the use of ICTs in mathematics and
science education. Initial appreciation and awareness about ICT
use can begin with minimal access to ICTs infrastructure and highly
effective mathematics and science teaching and learning can be achieved
through acquisition of low cost infrastructure.
One example of low cost infrastructure is the use of handheld computer
devices and wireless networks in mathematics and science education.
Handheld technologies such as the graphic calculator and wireless
networks are two of the most recent advances that are impacting
on the teaching and learning of mathematics and science in schools.
The graphic calculator, with the ability to handle numerical, algebraic,
statistical and geometrical functions as well as connect to data
capture devices such as temperature probes and light sensors, provides
for the first time a low cost, robust and portable general purpose
mathematical and scientific calculator.
The report's examination of the scope for ICT use in mathematics
and science identifies several different types of student activity
that can be supported through ICT use and also reveals that the
use of ICTs is particularly supportive of integrated styles of teaching
and learning. Such styles focus on problem solving and authentic
tasks that engage students in real world problems and provide opportunities
for students to apply in a manner similar to the workplace practice
of mathematical and scientific professionals.
Analysis of curriculum reform in the four participating countries
namely: Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam indicates that
there is new emphasis, across the school curriculum, on the importance
of the development of generic skills and processes (such as problem
solving, reasoning and communication) and the broadening of the
range of teaching and learning approaches used by teachers in classrooms.
These broader reform agenda are influencing the nature of the mathematics
and science curriculum currently under development or at early stages
of implementation in the participating countries. It is worth noting
that, in each of the four participating countries, the most recent
national statements make reference to the use of ICTs in teaching
and learning as having the potential to fundamentally change teaching
methods and shift the role of the student to that of a more active
and engaged learner.
|
Required
competencies for teachers
Given the long term goals of the project, the focus of teacher development,
both preservice and inservice, should be on producing teachers who
have the confidence and competence to:
|
| |
a. |
recognize
their role in the introduction of ICTs to mathematics and science
teaching and learning; |
| |
b. |
use
appropriately a wide range of technologies and resources (including
available digital ICT) to enhance student learning of mathematics
and science by deliberately choosing when to employ (and when not
to employ) those technologies in relation to their instructional
frameworks and level of schooling; |
| |
c. |
develop,
where necessary, their own ICT skills and the relevant ICT skills
of
their students; |
| |
d. |
reflect
critically on their use of ICTs for teaching and learning and professional
use; and |
| |
e. |
appreciate
the necessity of continued professional learning about the potential
of ICTs to enhance student learning, to influence what is taught and
how it is taught and to influence the organisation and evaluation
of student learning.
|
The
Project's research into pre-service and in-service teacher education
enabled the identification of principles of good practice in these
areas. In particular, attention was drawn to the increasing concerns
that common approaches to in service teacher development does not
lead to improvements in student learning outcomes. Given the mounting
evidence from studies undertaken on behalf of OECD (OECD, 1998),
World Bank (Craig et al, 1998) and UNESCO (UNESCO, 1998) that purposeful
school based professional learning is the most effective way to
improve student learning outcomes, the report argues that it is
critical for education systems to give sufficient attention to this
component of professional development, alongside the more conventional
cascade based training models most commonly used. This report presents
an analysis of purposeful school based learning, including a number
of approaches and strategies such as action learning projects, professional
portfolios and evidence based practice.
Two models were developed as outcomes of the Project, one for pre-service
teacher education and one for in-service teacher education, to provide
guidance to countries seeking to improve student leaming outcomes
in mathematics and science education through the use of ICT. The
elements of each model are drawn from research reports and reports
of lessons learned in various regions and countries.
Each model has been explicitly designed to build on current structures
and approaches in the four participating countries. Each focuses
on what is possible and each is general enough to be applied within
the different economic, social and educational contexts that exist
across the participating countries and, in fact, all SEAMEO Member
Countries.
|
Pre
service model for teacher development
The model developed for pre-service teacher education assumes a
formal programme of on-campus study, with periods of practice teaching,
prior to appointment as a teacher in schools. While other approaches
do exist, especially in response to acute shortages of teachers,
this was seen as the most common approach across the participating
countries. Essentially the model draws attention to the need to
develop:
|
| |
a. |
Institutional
capacity, by simultaneously attending to components of Infrastructure,
Governance, Applications and People. |
| |
b. |
A
staged approach to structural and pedagogical changes in line with
continuing developments in infrastructure and growing expertise
of teacher education staff. |
| |
c. |
Structural
elements that focus on clear programme statements of rationale and
goals for ICT use in teacher education; on defined graduate capabilities;
and on the development of teacher trainees in three areas: general
ICT skills, integration of ICTs in teaching and learning in mathematics
and science and use of ICTs in schools while practice teaching. |
| |
d. |
Pedagogical
elements that focus on the use of ICTs by teacher educators, trainee
teachers and supervising teachers for a wide range of purposes,
but particularly for enhancing teaching and learning in mathematics
and science education.
|
In
service model for teacher development
The in-service education model builds on current programmes and
approaches within the participating countries and recognises that
those countries need to focus on a wide range of issues and agendas.
Hence, it argues for including additional objectives and experiences
(that focus on ICT use in mathematics and science) into existing
programmes such as those to upgrade the qualifications of teachers.
It also argues for specific programmes that focus on ICT use in
mathematics and science education. The model also proposes
|
| |
a. |
The
simultaneous development of systemic capacity, through attention
to Infrastructure, Governance, Applications and People. |
| |
b. |
A
staged approach that recognises the variation in current situations
with regard to Infrastructure, Governance, Applications and People.
For countries, districts or schools in. the early stages of the
provision of ICT infrastructure, it means a focus on awareness and
potential. |
| |
c.
|
Structural
elements that focus on additional objectives and learning experiences
related to the use of ICTs for mathematics and science education,
as well as purposeful school based professional learning. |
| |
d. |
Pedagogical
elements that focus on the need for supportive leadership, a culture
of teachers learning through collaboration and reflective practice
and local accountability for school based learning.
|
Recommendations
SEAMEO
That
Seameo
-
seek the necessary support and funds to continue regional cooperation
around the development of effective methods of teacher development
in the area of ICT use in mathematics and science education. In
particular, that SEAMEO seek the support and funds to undertake
a collaborative regional pilot project in school based professional
learning.
-
work with the Australian Government to identify a possible role
for it in on-going work with SEAMEO in the area of ICT use in
mathematics and science education. In particular, that SEAMEO
work with the Australian Government to ascertain the feasibility
of Australia
participating
in or contributing to a collaborative regional pilot project.
|
Educational
policy makers in participating countries
That Ministries of Education and educational institutions review
the models defined in this report for applicability to their local
circumstances and as a process of review of current programmes and
approaches in relation to ICT use in mathematics and science teaching
and learning in schools.
That the appropriate organisations/institutions within the Ministries
that are responsible for curriculum development and teacher development
collaborate on the alignment of teacher development programmes and
curriculum materials that address the integration of ICT use in
mathematics and science education.
That Ministries of Education, in collaboration with regional partners,
establish a pilot project that focuses on purposeful school based
professional learning around the use of hand held ICTs in secondary
mathematics and science classrooms to improve student learning outcomes.
Leaders
in teacher education institutions
That leaders in teacher education institutions develop institutional
plans across the areas of Infrastructure, Governance, Applications
and People to facilitate the integration of ICT use in the pre-service
mathematics and science teacher education programmes.
That teacher educators work collaboratively to create programme
wide plans to develop the expected capabilities of graduates with
respect to ICT use in mathematics and science education. This would
include the identification of strands or subjects having main responsibility
for developing those capabilities.
School
leaders
That school leaders work with other staff to develop an understanding
of the concept of purposeful school based professional learning,
in its many forms, and (where appropriate) develop and incorporate
elements into a school's overall plan for the professional development
of its teachers, with particular attention to using ICTs in mathematics
and science education.
|
Education
researchers
That educational researchers work collaboratively with Ministries
of Education and other relevant parties to develop research agenda
around the design, implementation and evaluation of:
-
approaches to purposeful school based professional learning in
the areas of the integration of ICT into mathematics and science
education in schools.
-
teaching and learning experiences in mathematics and science education
that integrate the use of ICT for the improvement of student learning
outcomes.
|
A
recommended pilot project
That a regional collaborative pilot project, led by SEAMEO RECSAM,
and involving the Ministries of Education from participating countries,
be established to develop, implement and evaluate approaches to
purposeful school based professional learning with regard to the
effective use of ICTs in mathematics and science education. Given
the timeframe required for any outcomes of school based professional
learning approaches, it is recommended that the pilot project be
extended for two years with continuing evaluation documenting process
as well as outcomes. Given the work already done, in the four participating
countries, the taskforce recommend that these countries participate
to varying but agreed extents in the pilot project.
The
Pilot Project would enable trials of
-
Development of exemplars, local expertise and understandings of
both the effective integration of ICTs into mathematics and science
teaching and purposeful school based professional learning.
-
Development and evaluation of local approaches to purposeful school
based professional learning.
-
Development and evaluation of materials to support purposeful
school based professional learning around ICT use in mathematics
and science teaching.
|
The
Pilot Project would include
- Some
secondary schools where graphic calculators, probes and a projector
are provided by the proiect.
- Some
primary and secondary schools where a computer, projector and
digital camera are provided.
-
Some primary and secondary schools which already have computers
would be provided with a digital camera and projector.
|
The
Pilot Project would involve
-
RECSAM hosting a regional workshop, where key officials from each
country and selected leaders and teachers from participating schools
work collaboratively to develop understandings around the use
of ICTs in mathematics and science (with special attention to
handheld technologies such as the graphic calculator) and understandings
around the concepts of purposeful school based professional learning.
-
Within country teams of key officials and school personnel meeting
regularly to develop and share experiences and monitor progress
of the Pilot Project.
-
Within school teams working collaboratively, using an agreed approach
to purposeful professional learning, to develop understandings
of effective ways to integrate ICTs into mathematics and science
teaching.
|
|